Skip to main content
· 1/15/1895

Zapf v. State

Citations

  • 35 Fla. 210

Syllabus

<p>1. A record which only shows that a “jury were impaneled to try this cause,” is fatally defective in not showing that the jury was sworn.</p> <p>3. The fact of the jury being sworn should appear of record, and a recital that they were sworn in the b;ll of exceptions does not cure the defect.</p> <p>3. There is no inference that the jury was sworn from the use of the word “impaneled.”’ Impaneling has nothing to do with the drawing, selecting and swearing jurors, but simply means making the list of those who have been selected.</p>

Judges: Liddon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.