State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4256
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening timely filed, performance of appellate counsel, conduct of appellate counsel resulted in prejudice that would have resulted in a different outcome on appeal, plea of guilt, waiver of claimed errors. A plea of guilty waives an appellant's right to challenge on appeal his or her conviction on all potential issues except for jurisdictional issues and the claim that ineffective assistance of counsel caused the guilty plea to be less than knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Because appellant's plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made, the claimed errors raised in the application for reopening, which are not based upon any jurisdictional defects, are waived and no prejudice can be demonstrated by the appellant based upon appellate representation on appeal.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
- Village of Montpelier v. GreenoOhio Supreme Court· 1986-07-30· cited 118×
- Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 98×
- State v. MayOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-28· cited 18×
- State v. SzidnikOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 11×
- State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.