Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/30/2003
State v. Mitchell
Citations
- 62 P.3d 616
- 204 Ariz. 216
- 392 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
- 2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 9
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the act of “effecting arrest” is on-going, beginning with the officer’s first physical contact and continuing even after the arrest may be complete under the law
- discussing meaning of “effecting an 8 STATE v. JURDEN Opinion of the Court arrest”
- “The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect peace officers and citizens from substantial risk of physical injury.”
- “The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect peace officers and citizens from substantial risk of physical injury.”
- “The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect peace officers and citizens from substantial risk of physical injury.”
- determining the meaning of “effecting an arrest”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gemmill, Timmer, Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Samkeita Jahveh JurdenArizona Supreme Court· 2016-07-01· cited 48×
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-04-29· cited 30×
- City of Phoenix v. HarnishCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-12-28· cited 22×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-12· cited 19×
- State v. AjakSupreme Court of Missouri· 2018-04-03· cited 19×
- Morgan v. Carillon Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-04-29· cited 16×
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court· 2010-12-22· cited 15×
- State of Arizona v. Ronald VassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-09-24· cited 14×
- In re JESSI W.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-02-20· cited 13×
- Perdue v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2013-09-27· cited 11×
- Harris Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-11-26· cited 11×
- SFPP, L.P. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-02-25· cited 8×
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-04-22· cited 6×
- State v. JurdenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-06-23· cited 4×
- City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-05-19· cited 4×
- Jangula v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-04-22· cited 3×
- Fallon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2010-01-08· cited 3×
- In re Ubaldo B.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-12-23· cited 2×
- Alliance Trutrus, L.L.C. v. Carlson Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-02-28· cited 1×
- State v. CagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-11-03· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-04-30· cited 471×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court· 1990-06-26· cited 201×
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-07· cited 175×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 164×
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-31· cited 123×
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court· 1986-09-18· cited 110×
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-26· cited 105×
- State v. EdwardsArizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-23· cited 69×
- State v. WinegarArizona Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 64×
- State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-29· cited 40×
- State v. BoozerArizona Supreme Court· 1955-12-13· cited 36×
- Schrader v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-01· cited 27×
- Lewis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2000-08-31· cited 26×
- State v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-06-18· cited 8×
- State v. ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-04· cited 7×
- State v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-12-04· cited 5×
- Frederikson v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-11-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.