Skip to main content

State v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 62 P.3d 616
  • 204 Ariz. 216
  • 392 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
  • 2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the act of “effecting arrest” is on-going, beginning with the officer’s first physical contact and continuing even after the arrest may be complete under the law
  • discussing meaning of “effecting an 8 STATE v. JURDEN Opinion of the Court arrest”
  • “The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect peace officers and citizens from substantial risk of physical injury.”
  • “The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect peace officers and citizens from substantial risk of physical injury.”
  • “The purpose of the resisting arrest statute is to protect peace officers and citizens from substantial risk of physical injury.”
  • determining the meaning of “effecting an arrest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gemmill, Timmer, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.