Skip to main content

State v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 162 P.3d 18
  • 284 Kan. 374
  • 2007 Kan. LEXIS 365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Eighth-Amendment claims can't be raised in illegal-sentence motion
  • rejecting defendant's claims that his sentences were illegal for violating double jeopardy, equal protection, and the Eighth Amendment
  • determining district court did not have jurisdiction to consider defendant's constitutional claims brought in motion to correct an illegal sentence
  • declining to address the merits of double jeopardy, equal protection, and Eighth Amendment challenges to illegal sentence
  • district court had no jurisdiction to address defendant's constitutional claims under K.S.A. 22-3504
  • definition of illegal sentence does not encompass violations of constitutional provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.