Skip to main content

State v. Miranda

Citations

  • 984 N.W.2d 261
  • 313 Neb. 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “‘failing to meaningfully participate in voir dire’” sufficient, whereas “‘failing to zealously advocate’” insufficient
  • alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
  • appellate court does not resolve conflicts in evidence, pass on credibility of witnesses, or reweigh evidence; such matters are for finder of fact
  • assignment of error insufficiently alleged where appellant broadly argued that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file motions to suppress but failed to provide basis for filing such motions
  • ineffective assistance of counsel claim is raised on direct appeal when claim alleges deficient performance with enough particular- ity for (1) appellate court to make determination of whether claim can be decided upon trial record and (2
  • record on direct appeal is sufficient to conclusively determine claim of ineffective assistance of counsel if it establishes that trial counsel’s per- formance was not deficient or that appellant will not be able to establish prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.