Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 12/10/1996
State v. Miner
Citations
- 556 N.W.2d 578
- 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 1407
- 1996 WL 721551
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court found that “intent to dissuade” is not so inseparably connected to remainder of statute that Minnesota legislature would not have passed the statute without it
- court found that \intent to dissuade\ is not so inseparably connected to remainder of statute that Minnesota legislature would not have passed the statute without it
- court found that “intent to dissuade” is not so inseparably connected to remainder of statute that Minnesota legislature would not have passed the statute without it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson, Klaphake, Davies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 43×
- Binkowski v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-06-24· cited 19×
- State v. StockwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-08-11· cited 7×
- In Re the Welfare of C.P.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-06-27· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. HaagensenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-06-02
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 2,855×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 1,671×
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 1,514×
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court· 1964-06-01· cited 1,188×
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 810×
- Spence v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 802×
- Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 765×
- Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court· 1961-12-11· cited 433×
- Leathers v. MedlockSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 225×
- Matter of Welfare of S. L. J.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-02-17· cited 69×
- Francelle Dorman v. C. Robert Satti and Lester J. ForstSecond Circuit· 1988-12-07· cited 52×
- State v. KrawskySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-08-05· cited 52×
- Johnson v. State, Civil Service DepartmentSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-03-29· cited 37×
- Winchester & Western Railroad v. Virginia Corp. CommissionSupreme Court· 1989-06-05· cited 31×
- State v. HippSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-12-07· cited 29×
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Casino Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-11-06· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.