Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/7/2004
State v. Mills
Citations
- 602 S.E.2d 750
- 360 S.C. 621
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “we emphasize that the only issue before us is the construction of this particular statute and not the wisdom of the CSP statutory scheme as a whole”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-25· cited 37×
- State v. PICKLESIMERSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-07-06· cited 11×
- State v. McGrierSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-06-23· cited 10×
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-08-14· cited 6×
- Webb v. SowellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-19· cited 4×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-07-22· cited 110×
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-22· cited 78×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 44×
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-11-06· cited 33×
- State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-11-18· cited 27×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-04-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.