State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying new trial where juror employed as prison guard commented on her experiences with prisoners and prison life when evaluating credibility of witnesses because use of previous knowledge and experiences to evaluate evidence is not extrinsic information
• denying new trial where juror employed as prison guard commented on her experiences with prisoners and prison life when evaluating credibility of witnesses because use of previous knowledge and experiences to evaluate evidence is not extrinsic information
• while disposition of new trial motion is a matter within the trial judge’s discretion, the evidence supporting the motion for a new trial must “meet a threshold level before the court has any discretion to exercise”
• while disposition of new trial motion is a matter within the trial judge's discretion, the evidence supporting the motion for a new trial must \meet a threshold level before the court has any discretion to exercise\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Arnold
  New York Court of Appeals· 2001-06-12· cited 277×
• Meyer v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-12-19· cited 76×
• State v. Vogh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-20· cited 20×
• State v. Cheney
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-13· cited 11×
• Mitchell v. Mt. Hood Meadows Oreg.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-06· cited 7×
• Hill v. LaGrand Industrial Supply Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-09· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ertsgaard v. Beard
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-08· cited 27×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-02· cited 13×
• Ertsgaard v. Beard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-12· cited 3×