Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/2/1994
State v. Jones
Citations
- 126 Or. App. 224
- 868 P.2d 18
- 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court’s denial of motions for new trial reviewed for abuse of discretion
- trial court's denial of motions for new trial reviewed for abuse of discretion
- “Even if th[e] jury abro- gated the duty to deliberate because its members wished to go home early, we are not at liberty to invade the sanctity of their deliberations and order a new trial.”
- juror’s expression of intense beliefs about guilt not misconduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Riggs, Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Son v. Ashland Community Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 28×
- State v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-13· cited 11×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-03· cited 10×
- State v. BaldeagleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-03· cited 7×
- Jones v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-10-27· cited 4×
- State v. ChitwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17· cited 2×
- Ratliff v. DeMarinisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-04
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court· 1962-05-16· cited 46×
- Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court· 1963-05-29· cited 32×
- Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court· 1990-11-08· cited 27×
- Koennecke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-07-28· cited 16×
- State of Oregon v. ImlahOregon Supreme Court· 1955-04-06· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.