West Virginia Supreme Court· 11/19/1987

State v. Miller

Citations

363 S.E.2d 504
178 W. Va. 618
1987 W. Va. LEXIS 642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding error where undisclosed, incriminating oral statements were introduced yet trial court “utilized no sanctions to alleviate what was recognized as a prejudicial situation.”
“Even where the self-defense act is not a complete defense, it may serve to reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter because of provocation.”
“Rule 16(d)(2) [of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure] enables a trial court to impose sanctions that may have the effect of curing a late discovery problem.”
\Rule 16(d)(2) [of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure] enables a trial court to impose sanctions that may have the effect of curing a late discovery problem.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.