Skip to main content

State v. Miguel

Citations

  • 611 P.2d 125
  • 125 Ariz. 538
  • 1980 Ariz. App. LEXIS 441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that consent is a defense to a crime that requires the State to prove a taking was “against the will” of the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor, Eubank, Department, Haire

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.