State v. Meyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that there “was no specific curative instruction given by the court in this case because the court overruled defense counsel's objection”
• stating that “no specific curative instruction was given by the court in this case because the court overruled defense counsel’s objection to the DPA’s [statements]”
• “generally relevant jury instructions can cure improper arguments by a prosecutor; especially where, as here, such instructions were given repeatedly” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schnabel.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-05-11· cited 36×
• State v. Tuua
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-04-20· cited 25×
• State v. Carvalho
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2004-10-22· cited 6×
• State v. Bousman
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-12-31

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Clark
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-10-03· cited 141×
• State v. Loa
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-11-06· cited 94×
• State v. Klinge
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2000-02-04· cited 86×
• State v. McGriff
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-04-11· cited 86×
• State v. Valdivia
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-06-07· cited 86×
• State v. Kupihea
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-01-12· cited 50×
• State v. Lincoln
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-03-30· cited 30×