Texas Supreme Court· 5/18/1966

State v. Meyer

Citations

403 S.W.2d 366
9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 404
1966 Tex. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “abutting property owners have certain private rights in existing streets and highways in addition to their right in common with the general public to use them”
noting that a different rule applies with regard to a controlled-access highway
noting that a different rule applies with regard to a controlled-access highway
in condemnation proceeding, both sides agreed that access rights were not included in taking in fee simple; therefore “access appurtenant to their remaining land is still attached”
in condemnation proceeding, both sides agreed that access rights were not included in taking in fee simple; therefore \access appurtenant to their remaining land is still attached\
in condemnation proceeding, both sides agreed that access rights were not included in taking in fee simple; therefore “access appurtenant to their remaining land is still attached”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Griffin, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.