Skip to main content

In re State

Citations

  • 355 S.W.3d 611
  • 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1754
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 605
  • 2011 WL 3796616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding appellate remedy was inadequate “because of the enormous waste of judicial and public resources that compliance with the trial court’s order would entail”
  • severance is proper if controversy involves multiple causes of action, severed claim could be independently asserted, and severed claim is not so interwoven with remaining claim that they involve same facts and issues
  • “We believe that the circumstances of this case also make the appellate remedy inadequate because of the enormous waste of judicial and 8 public resources that compliance with the trial court’s order would entail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jefferson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re State

53 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.