State v. Mendoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a district court may revoke 9 probation based on a “reasonable certainty as to satisfy the conscience of the court of 10 the truth of the violation,” rather than under the beyond a reasonable doubt standard 11 required for a criminal prosecution
• “A probationer is a person convicted of an offense, and the suspension of his sentence remains within the control of the [trial] court” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Leon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-12-26· cited 190×
• State v. Guthrie
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-04-01· cited 85×
• State v. Castillo
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-04-24· cited 24×
• Attorney General v. Montoya
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-07-08· cited 4×
• State v. Leon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-10-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burns v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 523×
• State v. Brusenhan
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-02-16· cited 49×
• State ex rel. O'Connor v. Wolfer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1893-04-27· cited 34×
• Blea v. Cox
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1965-06-28· cited 29×
• Ex parte Lucero
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-11-12· cited 27×
• State v. Peoples
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-08-22· cited 15×