New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/17/2001
State v. Mendez
Citations
- 785 A.2d 945
- 345 N.J. Super. 498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding tampering conviction where the defendant held a bag of white, powdery substance out the window of a moving car while being chased by police, thereby destroying the only evidence of a possible underlying crime
- upholding a tampering conviction where the defendant had tossed, and the police were unable to recover, a bag containing an unknown quantity of an unknown white, powdery substance out the window of a car being chased by police
- upholding a tampering conviction where the defendant had tossed, and the police were unable to recover, a bag containing an unknown quantity of an unknown white, powdery substance out the window of a car being chased by police
- “[T]he use of the word ‘attempts’ in the definition of a substantive offense does not necessarily reflect a legislative intent to import the law of attempt, including the ‘purposeful’ culpability requirement, into that offense.”
- indicating \knowingly flees or attempts to elude\ requires knowing culpability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Skillman, Wallace, Jr. and Wells
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MajorsTennessee Supreme Court· 2010-09-03· cited 573×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-07-22· cited 50×
- State v. RadosevichNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2018-04-12· cited 50×
- State v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-07-23· cited 35×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-06-03· cited 32×
- State v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-06-23· cited 27×
- State v. DixonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-12-20· cited 26×
- State v. N.I.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-03-14· cited 20×
- State v. MendezSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-11-14· cited 18×
- People v. BrakeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-27· cited 15×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-04-06· cited 14×
- In re Juvenile 2003-187Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-04-30· cited 11×
- State v. MosconeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-01-13· cited 7×
- Souci v. William C. Smith & Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-07· cited 2×
- State v. KuhnNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2010-08-06· cited 2×
- State v. NINew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-03-14
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AfanadorSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-23· cited 360×
- State v. HarmonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-10-14· cited 97×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-07-14· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. GovensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-28· cited 63×
- Lewis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-08-14· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-03· cited 44×
- State v. PattonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1994-09-06· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-25· cited 33×
- State v. SharplessNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-08-04· cited 31×
- Vigue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-09-03· cited 30×
- State v. FuquaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-07-03· cited 30×
- State v. LoganCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-04-01· cited 27×
- State v. SeymourNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-03-26· cited 23×
- M.F. v. M.F.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-02· cited 22×
- Frayer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-06-18· cited 16×
- In Re MFAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-02· cited 15×
- State v. SpethNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-07-14· cited 13×
- State v. CrescenziNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-03-30· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.