State v. Speth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \knowingly\ culpability requirement of the offense of witness tampering, which proscribes \knowingly attempt[ing]\ to induce a witness to give false testimony (see n. 5 infra
• \In the case of witness tampering . . . the criminal act is completed regardless of whether or not the result is achieved.\
• in which the trial court permitted both sides to supplement any summations after deliberations were underway, in a complex case where lengthy deliberations over several weeks had been interrupted by religious holidays and a weekend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).