Skip to main content

State v. Mears

Citations

  • 749 A.2d 600
  • 170 Vt. 336
  • 2000 Vt. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that trial court’s determination of whether defendant suffered prejudice to warrant new trial depends on “totality of the circumstances, considering the testimony within the context of the entire proceedings”
  • explaining that court’s curative instruction was sufficient to cure any potential prejudice
  • plain error exists where failure to recognize error would result in miscarriage of justice
  • plain error exists where failure to recognize error would result in miscarriage of justice
  • an immediate and unequivocal instruction may cure any potential prejudice
  • an immediate and unequivocal instruction may cure any potential prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Mears

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.