Skip to main content
· 4/9/2004

State v. Ingerson

Citations

  • 2004 VT 36
  • 852 A.2d 567
  • 176 Vt. 428
  • 2004 Vt. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “court has broad discretion when imposing a sentence,” and that sentence will be affirmed on appeal “if it falls within statutory limits . . . and it was not derived from the court’s reliance on improper or inaccurate information” (citation omitted)
  • “The proper purposes of the sentencing of criminal offenders are generally thought to encompass punishment, prevention, restraint, rehabilitation, deterrence, education, and retribution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund, Reiber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.