Montana Supreme Court· 5/31/1978
State v. Meadors
Citations
- 580 P.2d 903
- 177 Mont. 100
- 1978 Mont. LEXIS 824
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statute prohibiting the possession of \any dangerous drug\ required separate offenses because the legislature specifically stated what SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0
- concluding that statute prohibiting the possession of \any dangerous drug\ required separate offenses because the legislature specifically stated what SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0
- legislature did not intend to treat all prohibited drugs as a generic drug or unit, but meant to provide a distinct crime for possessing each different type of prohibited drug
- legislature did not intend to treat all prohibited drugs as a generic drug or unit, but meant to provide a distinct crime for possessing each different type of prohibited drug
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haswell, Shea, Daly, Harrison, Sorte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-04-12· cited 331×
- State v. TwohigNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-10· cited 74×
- State v. ZaccagniniWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-09-29· cited 68×
- State v. CrowderMontana Supreme Court· 1991-04-24· cited 45×
- State v. MeaderMontana Supreme Court· 1979-10-03· cited 30×
- State v. BarnettWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-02· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. GrubbKentucky Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 19×
- Andrews v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-03-01· cited 8×
- State v. CasarezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-07· cited 3×
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-06· cited 1×
- Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-12-16· cited 1×
- ANDREWS (RYAN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2018-03-01
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
- Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 699×
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-11-29· cited 288×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 100×
- Ramona Cipres and Juan Montes Deoca v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1965-03-18· cited 95×
- Braden v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1920-12-14· cited 58×
- State v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court· 1960-12-22· cited 53×
- Parmagini v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1930-07-28· cited 42×
- State v. LenonMontana Supreme Court· 1977-10-26· cited 36×
- State v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court· 1977-10-25· cited 35×
- Layland v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-05-21· cited 35×
- United States v. MartinW.D. Pennsylvania· 1969-07-21· cited 24×
- United States v. James G. MartinThird Circuit· 1970-07-16· cited 22×
- State v. AdamsSuperior Court of Delaware· 1976-09-16· cited 15×
- State v. FettersMontana Supreme Court· 1974-09-03· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Lance v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court· 1975-11-12· cited 6×
- Martin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-12-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.