Skip to main content

State v. Meadors

Citations

  • 580 P.2d 903
  • 177 Mont. 100
  • 1978 Mont. LEXIS 824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statute prohibiting the possession of \any dangerous drug\ required separate offenses because the legislature specifically stated what SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0
  • concluding that statute prohibiting the possession of \any dangerous drug\ required separate offenses because the legislature specifically stated what SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0
  • legislature did not intend to treat all prohibited drugs as a generic drug or unit, but meant to provide a distinct crime for possessing each different type of prohibited drug
  • legislature did not intend to treat all prohibited drugs as a generic drug or unit, but meant to provide a distinct crime for possessing each different type of prohibited drug

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haswell, Shea, Daly, Harrison, Sorte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.