State v. Meade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the raising of an issue is essential to preservation, and that identifying a source for a claimed position and making a particular argument are less essential
• consecutive sentences overturned on appeal based on argument to trial court equivalent to argument made by defendant, here
• consecutive sentences overturned on appeal based on argument to trial court equivalent to argument made by defendant, here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bighouse
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-22· cited 3×
• State v. Meade
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-12

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State v. Ice
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 113×
• Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
  Supreme Court· 2008-03-17· cited 91×
• State v. Fuerte-Coria
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-10· cited 46×
• State v. Heilman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-30· cited 12×
• State v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-21· cited 11×