Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 10/22/1996
State v. Meade
Citations
- 942 S.W.2d 561
- 1996 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 673
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that trial court’s action of dividing a single sentence into separate portions for consecutive and concurrent sentencing was improper
- holding failure to raise issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in motion for new trial waives the issue.
- eviden ce sufficient for secon d degree m urder where defendant shot one victim five or six times, including once exec ution-style
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peay, Welles, Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.