State v. Meacham
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5645
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the victim to testify with the assistance of a therapy dog. Expert witness's statement in the victim's medical records that over 90 percent of children's sexual assault examinations are normal was admissible. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a summary of the victim's forensic interview. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence.
Judges: Jamison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 328×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-25· cited 129×
- State v. EasthamOhio Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 126×
- State v. KurtzOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-27· cited 37×
- State v. GutierrezOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-27· cited 24×
- State v. WarmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-23· cited 18×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-03· cited 16×
- State v. JacobsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-21· cited 13×
- State v. WattsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-16· cited 10×
- State v. HasenyagerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-22· cited 6×
- State v. LaceyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.