State v. Lacey

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 4145

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant, following a jury trial, was convicted of rape, gross sexual imposition, and importuning. The jury's verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Further, the trial court did not err by overruling Defendant-appellant's motion seeking an independent medical examination of the victim. The trial court, finally, did not err when it sustained the State's motion allowing the minor victim to testify with a facility dog present in the courtroom. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurs in judgment only.)