Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/8/1992
State v. McMahon
Citations
- 603 A.2d 1128
- 158 Vt. 640
- 1992 Vt. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We have never held that a defendant is entitled to an explanation of `reasonable doubt'. . .\
- \We have never held that a defendant is entitled to an explanation of `reasonable doubt'. . .\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, C.J., and Gibson, Dooley, Morse and Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-08· cited 41×
- United States v. Eric Arthur Walton, United States of America v. Eldridge Mayfield, A/K/A SippyFourth Circuit· 2000-03-27· cited 39×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-06-13· cited 20×
- State v. Paul R. AlzagaSupreme Court of Vermont· 2019-10-04· cited 9×
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-11-15· cited 1×
- United States v. WaltonFourth Circuit· 2000-03-27
- In re YohVermont Superior Court· 2005-01-31
- State v. Rein KoltsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2026-04-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miles v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1881-04-18· cited 245×
- State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-19· cited 68×
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-02-10· cited 58×
- State v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-05-08· cited 32×
- State v. MarstonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1909-05-31· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.