Skip to main content

State v. McKinney

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4826

Syllabus

RESTITUTION — SENTENCING: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering restitution for damage to the prosecuting witness's car hood where there was competent, credible evidence in the record to show that the economic loss sustained by the owner of the car was a direct and proximate result of defendant's conduct in throwing a brick at the car's windshield.

Judges: Kinsley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.