State v. McKinney
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4826
Syllabus
RESTITUTION — SENTENCING: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering restitution for damage to the prosecuting witness's car hood where there was competent, credible evidence in the record to show that the economic loss sustained by the owner of the car was a direct and proximate result of defendant's conduct in throwing a brick at the car's windshield.
Judges: Kinsley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2013-12-20· cited 64×
- State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 42×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-20· cited 12×
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-01· cited 9×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-05· cited 6×
- State v. FolsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-11· cited 4×
- State v. HaskettOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.