State v. McIntyre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the enactment of OEC 404(4) “effectively removed [the sixth] factor from the Johns analysis”
• stating that the enactment of OEC 404(4) “effectively removed [the sixth] factor from the Johns analysis”
• the Johns test serves “[t]o ensure that the necessary degree of similarity exists between multiple instances of similar conduct”
• in criminal actions, OEC 404(4) “precludes a trial court from excluding evidence of a defendant’s other crimes, wrongs, or acts under OEC 403, except as required by the state or federal constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brumbach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-10· cited 20×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 13×
• State v. Tena
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 10×
• State v. Goff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-09· cited 7×
• State v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johns
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 242×
• State v. Shaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 64×
• State v. Leistiko
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-07-19· cited 56×
• State v. Rinkin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-29· cited 21×
• State v. Berg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-29· cited 20×
• State v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-19· cited 19×
• State v. Deloretto
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 15×
• State v. Wilhelm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-21· cited 12×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 7×
• State v. Leistiko
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-01-05· cited 6×