Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/9/2006
State v. McIntosh
Citations
- 213 Ariz. 579
- 146 P.3d 80
- 490 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15
- 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- juror “sign[ed]” verdict form as required by Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 23.1(a) by affixing his juror number rather than his signature
- jury verdict is “signed” for purpose of Rule 23.1(a), Ariz. R. Crim. P., “[a]s long as the mark used evidences authentication of the verdict by the jury foreperson”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gemmill, Norris, Timmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
- State v. GuerraArizona Supreme Court· 1989-06-13· cited 341×
- State v. RamirezArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 169×
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-18· cited 79×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 2000-06-15· cited 51×
- Marriage of Fenn v. FennCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-11· cited 45×
- Byers-Watts v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-03-29· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.