Skip to main content

State v. McGuire

Citations

  • 490 S.E.2d 912
  • 200 W. Va. 823
  • 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Our review of the legal correctness of a jury instruction ... is performed de novo[.]\ (footnote omitted)
  • “It is intent without malice, not heat of passion, which is the distinguishing feature of voluntary manslaughter.” (In part).
  • “It is intent without malice, not heat of passion, which is the distinguishing feature of voluntary manslaughter.” (In part).
  • “The order also provided Appellant must pay for her electronic monitoring.”
  • “Gross provocation and heat of passion are not essential elements of voluntary manslaughter, and, therefore, they need not be proven by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. It is intent without malice, not heat of passion, which is the distinguishing feature of voluntary manslaughter.”
  • “Gross provocation and heat of passion are not essential elements of voluntary manslaughter, and, therefore, they need not be proven by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. It is intent without malice, not heat of passion, which is the distinguishing feature of voluntary manslaughter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Workman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.