Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Oregon Supreme Court· 3/6/2003

State v. McGinnis

Citations

  • 64 P.3d 1123
  • 335 Or. 243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Fully aware of the advantages and disadvantages of testifying, [the] defendant chose to take the stand and to meet the state’s evidence. Under such circumstances, there is no reason to exclude the defendant’s testimony from a review of the record for harmless error.”
  • “Fully aware of the advantages and disadvantages of testifying, defendant chose to take the stand and to meet the state’s evidence. Under such circumstances, there is no reason to exclude defendant’s testimony from a review of the record for harmless error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz Balmer, De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.