Skip to main content

State v. McGill

Citations

  • 112 Wash. App. 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that remand is not required when the reviewing court is confident that the trial court would impose the same sentence
  • sentencing court erroneously believed that it lacked authority to impose an exceptional sentence below the standard range
  • sentencing court erred when it failed to recognize it had authority to impose an exceptional sentence
  • sentencing court erred when it failed to recognize it had authority to impose an exceptional sentence
  • this statute prohibits appeals of only the length of time imposed and not the legal basis to impose such a sentence
  • \'I'm sure you are aware that the legislature has decided that judges should not have discretion beyond a certain sentencing range on these matters.\'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.