Skip to main content

State v. McElrath

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 2475

Syllabus

The record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the trial court's consecutive-sentence findings. Appellant's professed lack of awareness about the potential for consecutive sentences did not invalidate his guilty plea. Defense counsel did not provide ineffective assistance at sentencing by failing to address the statutory consecutive-sentencing factors. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.