State v. McElrath
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2475
Syllabus
The record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the trial court's consecutive-sentence findings. Appellant's professed lack of awareness about the potential for consecutive sentences did not invalidate his guilty plea. Defense counsel did not provide ineffective assistance at sentencing by failing to address the statutory consecutive-sentencing factors. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. WithrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 72×
- State v. ShadeOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-28· cited 5×
- State v. SwaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-24· cited 4×
- State v. KoobOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.