State v. McCullough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “juvenile adjudications themselves are not the equivalent of criminal proceedings”
• quot- ing Nunner v. Erickson, 151 Or 575, 609, 51 P2d 839 (1935)
• “[I]f a person engages in conduct that is classified, by statute, as a felony, that person commits ‘a crime punishable as a felony,’ whether or not that person is actually punished for committing a felony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hubbell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2023-10-05· cited 48×
• Johnson v. Gibson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 17×
• State v. Haley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2023-06-01· cited 17×
• State v. Carpenter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-08-08· cited 15×
• Comcast Corp. III v. Dept. of Rev. (TC 4909)
  Oregon Tax Court· 2016-09-15· cited 13×
• State v. N. R. L.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-10-03· cited 12×
• State v. Garcia
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-08-03· cited 5×
• Yearby v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-03-23· cited 3×
• State v. R. J. S.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 2×
• State v. Dutton
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-06-28· cited 1×
• In the Interest of: P.L.S. v. Juvenile Officer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-09-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Reynolds
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-09-03· cited 71×
• Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-04-07· cited 52×
• Liberty v. State, Department of Transportation
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-24· cited 22×
• State v. McCullough
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-19· cited 1×