State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the juvenile code changed the way juveniles were treated and created a proceeding that is “sui generis”
• “noting that no federal or Oregon authority heretofore has required a jury trial in juvenile court” under either Article I, section 11 (criminal jury trial) or section 17 (civil jury trial)
• explaining the 1959 comprehensive revision that overhauled piecemeal legislation enacted from 1907 onward into a comprehen- sive code
• reviewing history of juvenile proceedings in Oregon and then-current juvenile code and concluding that “Ijluvenile courts are concerned with rehabilitation, not punishment”
• using the term “adjudicatory hearing” to refer to the “jurisdictional phase” of a juvenile delinquency proceeding
• analyzing pre-1993 cases related to Oregon’s policies regarding youths who engage in criminal conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).