State v. McConville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no evidence supporting inference that theft of the victim’s jewelry ended before theft of her laptop began during burglary
• summarily rejecting “state’s contention that the trial court’s entry of two first-degree theft convictions [instead of a single merged conviction] is not an appealable ‘disposition’ under ORS 138.050(1)”
• “As the party asserting that [the] defendant’s conduct * * * is ‘separately punishable’ for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), the state has the burden of adducing legally sufficient evidence of the requisite ‘sufficient pause.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-30· cited 25×
• State v. Reeves
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-06· cited 19×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 14×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-03· cited 11×
• State v. Cale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 7×
• State v. Gerlach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-13· cited 6×
• State v. Avila
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 6×
• State v. Ortiz-Rico
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-18· cited 6×
• State v. Vargas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-10· cited 2×