State v. McConville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no evidence supporting inference that theft of the victim’s jewelry ended before theft of her laptop began during burglary
• summarily rejecting “state’s contention that the trial court’s entry of two first-degree theft convictions [instead of a single merged conviction] is not an appealable ‘disposition’ under ORS 138.050(1)”
• “As the party asserting that [the] defendant’s conduct * * * is ‘separately punishable’ for purposes of ORS 161.067(3), the state has the burden of adducing legally sufficient evidence of the requisite ‘sufficient pause.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).