State v. McCleary
Citations
- 2025 ND 24
Syllabus
Application of the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act is limited to those instances where a detainer has been filed against a person imprisoned in a penal or correctional institution in North Dakota already serving a sentence within the state. The UMDDA does not apply to prisoners who have been released on parole because the person is no longer imprisoned serving a sentence for a term of commitment. A defendant who stipulates the statutory habitual offender requirements were met waives any alleged procedural defects by the district court in applying the habitual offender sentencing enhancements.
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-31· cited 35×
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-10-11· cited 34×
- State v. MoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-07-06· cited 21×
- Gooss v. GoossNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-11-19· cited 18×
- State v. JulianSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-12-09· cited 15×
- State v. HinojosaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-06-21· cited 13×
- State Ex Rel. Haynes v. BellamyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-01-12· cited 13×
- State v. YzetaNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-01-06· cited 13×
- State v. RipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-14· cited 9×
- State v. NupdalNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-11-17· cited 7×
- State v. VONBEHRENCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-01-12· cited 5×
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-06-10· cited 4×
- State v. McClearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-01-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.