State v. Ripley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detain-ers Act, the ninety-day period begins to run when the district court and prosecuting official receive the defendant’s request
• holding that under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act, the ninety-day period begins to run when the district court and prosecuting official receive the defendant’s request
• holding that under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act, the ninety-day period begins to run when the district court and prosecuting official receive the defendant’s request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Foster
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 33×
• Murchison v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 12×
• State v. Fulks
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-07-17· cited 8×
• State v. Gibson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-02-16· cited 6×
• State v. McCleary
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-01-23· cited 1×
• In Interest of A.E., a Child - Criminal No. 960079
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-01-16

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Adams County Record v. Greater North Dakota Ass'n
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-03-16· cited 48×
• State Ex Rel. Kemp v. Hodge
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-03-09· cited 39×
• State v. Carlson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-10-11· cited 34×
• State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 31×
• State v. Kania
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-11-23· cited 17×
• People v. Lopez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-07-06· cited 16×
• Pierson v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1972-11-04· cited 14×
• State v. Olsen
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 14×