State v. McClain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testimony admitted not to show that the statements in the Miranda warning were true, but rather to show that Miranda was given
• “Clearly the state was not attempting to prove the truth of the matter stated, viz., the Miranda warnings. The evidence was offered for the purpose of establishing that the warnings were stated and explained to the defendant prior to the interview.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-07-23· cited 72×
• State v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-04-19· cited 50×
• Ehrlich v. Backes
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-11-12· cited 20×
• State v. James
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-11-05· cited 17×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-06-08· cited 14×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Millard Robert Beasley v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1974-02-01· cited 536×
• Winter v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1972-11-04· cited 53×
• State v. Wheeler
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 29×
• State v. Rhoten
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1953-05-09· cited 14×