Skip to main content

State v. McCarthy

Citations

  • 589 A.2d 869
  • 156 Vt. 148
  • 1991 Vt. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the \admission of extensive details of defendant's alleged prior misconduct\ of sexual assaults constituted plain error
  • holding that the “admission of extensive details of defendant’s alleged prior misconduct” of sexual assaults constituted plain error
  • concluding that admission of character evidence was “plain error”
  • finding that erroneous admission of defendant’s prior sexual misconduct was not harmless where the “case could have gone either way, depending upon whether the jury believed complainant beyond a reasonable doubt or believed defendant”
  • applying plain-error rule necessarily involves appellate discretion and weighing of all relevant factors
  • applying plain-error rule necessarily involves appellate discretion and weighing of all relevant factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Peck, Dooley, Morse, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.