Maple v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction for failure to instruct on elements of offense; no harmless error analysis
• reversing conviction for failure to instruct on elements of offense; no harmless error analysis
• cross-examination may include details sufficient to show that same character traits are involved but not “unnecessary or prejudicial details”
• reversed because officer allowed to testify as to extrajudicial identification by victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).