State v. McCarthy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vulgar and offensive insulting words and conduct directed at individual that also aroused alarm in others sufficient to support disorderly conduct conviction
• “In determining if [the defendant’s] actions were sufficient to support a conviction of disorderly conduct, we view his words, coupled with his conduct and physical movements, and measure them as a package against the controlling statute.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John Hugh Gilmore v. City of Minneapolis
  Eighth Circuit· 2016-09-13· cited 42×
• State v. Allcock
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-06-09· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Webb
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
• State v. Alton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-12-09· cited 74×
• Matter of Welfare of S. L. J.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-02-17· cited 69×
• State v. Cox
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-23· cited 25×
• State v. Klimek
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-23· cited 5×