Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 4/30/1986

State v. Max

Citations

714 S.W.2d 289
1986 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 2673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that one challenging the trial court’s decision to seat an alternate juror has the burden of demonstrating how he or she was prejudiced by that action
holding that in order to challenge the trial court’s decision to seat an alternate juror a defendant has burden of demonstrating how he or she was prejudiced by that action
statements in briefs as to what occurred in the trial court cannot be considered unless they are supported by the record
“Statements in briefs as to what occurred in the trial court cannot be considered unless they are supported by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Daughtrey, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.