State v. Maule

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process was not violated when the trial court refused to allow the defense to cross-examine the witness at the competency hearing after the State had asked questions before the trial court
• \the State's interest in testimony from a witness who is incompetent is nil\
• “the State’s interest in testimony from a witness who is incompetent is nil”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brousseau
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-08-18· cited 41×
• State v. Maule
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-05· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Morris v. Blaker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-01-02· cited 130×
• State v. Allen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-03-09· cited 115×
• In Re MB
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 69×
• In re the Interest of M.B.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 67×
• United States v. Alfred Marion Spoonhunter, Sr.
  Tenth Circuit· 1973-04-10· cited 55×
• Matter of Dependency of AEP
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 51×
• In re Dependency of A.E.P.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 49×
• State v. Watkins
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-08-30· cited 20×
• United States v. Allen J.
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-11-07· cited 11×
• Stone v. Prosser Consolidated School District No. 116
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-11· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Massey
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-06· cited 5×