Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/5/2002
State v. Maule
Citations
- 51 P.3d 811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the State's interest in testimony from a witness who is incompetent is nil\
- “the State’s interest in testimony from a witness who is incompetent is nil”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court· 1992-01-02· cited 130×
- State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 1967-03-09· cited 115×
- In Re MBCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 69×
- In re the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-07-10· cited 67×
- United States v. Alfred Marion Spoonhunter, Sr.Tenth Circuit· 1973-04-10· cited 55×
- Matter of Dependency of AEPWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 51×
- In re Dependency of A.E.P.Washington Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 49×
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-08-30· cited 20×
- United States v. Allen J.Tenth Circuit· 1997-11-07· cited 11×
- Stone v. Prosser Consolidated School District No. 116Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-11· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. DoucetteMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-08-20· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. MasseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-06· cited 5×
- State v. MauleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-05· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.