Skip to main content

State v. Matthews

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3694

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in imposing sentences that were within the statutory ranges after considering the principles and purposes of sentencing contained in R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors listed in R.C. 2929.12. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.