State v. Mata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, by asking a defendant for consent to obtain a DNA sample, the state did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights
• defendant = s consent to the taking of a blood sample for DNA testing was not a critical stage of the proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lemmons v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-03-21· cited 104×
• State v. Blye
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2004-02-25· cited 12×
• Hale v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2007-03-22· cited 3×
• Gary Wayne Hale, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2007-03-22

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Wade
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
• Guzman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
• Powell v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
• United States v. Ash
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 868×
• Green v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-12· cited 127×
• United States v. Alfonso Hidalgo
  Eleventh Circuit· 1993-11-29· cited 69×
• United States v. Kon Yu-Leung
  Second Circuit· 1990-07-25· cited 28×
• United States v. Shlater
  N.D. Indiana· 1994-12-23· cited 1×