United States v. Alfonso Hidalgo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that fruits of search are not evidence of a testimonial or communicative nature
• upholding finding that defendant voluntarily consented to search after being arrested and forced to the ground at gunpoint and invoking the right to remain silent
• Fifih Amendment does not apply even though defendant consented to search after receiving Miranda warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).