Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/23/2020

State v. Mast

Citations

  • 301 Or. App. 809
  • 459 P.3d 938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing whether evidence derived from the preceding Article I, sec- tion 12, violation for legal error
  • applying the Vondehn test to determine whether statements made after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed, but applying the Jarnagin test to determine whether physical evidence obtained after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed
  • applying the Vondehn test to determine whether statements made after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed, but applying the Jarnagin test to determine whether physical evidence obtained after belated Miranda warnings should be suppressed
  • We “are bound by the trial court’s express factual findings if evidence in the record supports them.”
  • “Although applying some similar factors, the analysis set forth in Jarnagin differs from the analysis in Vondehn[.]”
  • “Although applying some similar factors, the analysis set forth in Jarnagin differs from the analysis in Vondehn[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.