Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/16/1999

State v. Massey

Citations

730 A.2d 623
169 Vt. 180
1999 Vt. LEXIS 80
1999 WL 219185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing defendant’s post-charge objection as “cryptic,” considering what defendant might have meant, and noting that defendant had failed to propose alternative instruction that “would have made his position clear to the court”
describing defendant’s post-charge objection as “cryptic,” considering what defendant might have meant, and noting that defendant had failed to propose alternative instruction that “would have made his position clear to the court”
“Without evidence attacking the DataMaster’s reliability, defendant’s arguments go only to the weight that the jury could give to the test results and not to admissibility.”
“Questions of admissibility of evidence are for the court, see V.R.E. 104, and involve the discretion of the trial judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.